SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2503.14362

Streaming and Massively Parallel Algorithms for Euclidean Max-Cut

Abstract

Given a set of vectors $X = \{ x_1,\dots, x_n \} \subset \mathbb{R}^d$, the Euclidean max-cut problem asks to partition the vectors into two parts so as to maximize the sum of Euclidean distances which cross the partition. We design new algorithms for Euclidean max-cut in models for massive datasets: $\bullet$ We give a fully-scalable constant-round MPC algorithm using $O(nd) + n \cdot \text{poly}( \log(n) / \epsilon)$ total space which gives a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate Euclidean max-cut. $\bullet$ We give a dynamic streaming algorithm using $\text{poly}(d \log \Delta / \epsilon)$ space when $X \subseteq [\Delta]^d$, which provides oracle access to a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate Euclidean max-cut. Recently, Chen, Jiang, and Krauthgamer $[\text{STOC}~'23]$ gave a dynamic streaming algorithm with space $\text{poly}(d\log\Delta/\epsilon)$ to approximate the value of the Euclidean max-cut, but could not provide oracle access to an approximately optimal cut. This was left open in that work, and we resolve it here. Both algorithms follow from the same framework, which analyzes a ``parallel'' and ``subsampled'' (Euclidean) version of a greedy algorithm of Mathieu and Schudy $[\text{SODA}~'08]$ for dense max-cut.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicolas Menand, Erik Waingarten. 2025-03-18. Streaming and Massively Parallel Algorithms for Euclidean Max-Cut. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14362

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS