SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2503.22749

Adaptive Clipping for Privacy-Preserving Few-Shot Learning: Enhancing Generalization with Limited Data

Abstract

In the era of data-driven machine-learning applications, privacy concerns and the scarcity of labeled data have become paramount challenges. These challenges are particularly pronounced in the domain of few-shot learning, where the ability to learn from limited labeled data is crucial. Privacy-preserving few-shot learning algorithms have emerged as a promising solution to address such pronounced challenges. However, it is well-known that privacy-preserving techniques often lead to a drop in utility due to the fundamental trade-off between data privacy and model performance. To enhance the utility of privacy-preserving few-shot learning methods, we introduce a novel approach called Meta-Clip. This technique is specifically designed for meta-learning algorithms, including Differentially Private (DP) model-agnostic meta-learning, DP-Reptile, and DP-MetaSGD algorithms, with the objective of balancing data privacy preservation with learning capacity maximization. By dynamically adjusting clipping thresholds during the training process, our Adaptive Clipping method provides fine-grained control over the disclosure of sensitive information, mitigating overfitting on small datasets and significantly improving the generalization performance of meta-learning models. Through comprehensive experiments on diverse benchmark datasets, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in minimizing utility degradation, showcasing a superior privacy-utility trade-off compared to existing privacy-preserving techniques. The adoption of Adaptive Clipping represents a substantial step forward in the field of privacy-preserving few-shot learning, empowering the development of secure and accurate models for real-world applications, especially in scenarios where there are limited data availability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kanishka Ranaweera, Dinh C. Nguyen, Pubudu N. Pathirana, David Smith, Ming Ding, Thierry Rakotoarivelo, Aruna Seneviratne. 2025-03-27. Adaptive Clipping for Privacy-Preserving Few-Shot Learning: Enhancing Generalization with Limited Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22749

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG