Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.22933

Improving Transportability of Regression Calibration Under the Main/External Validation Study Design

Zexiang Li·Donna Spiegelman·Molin Wang·Zuoheng Wang·Xin Zhou
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In epidemiology, obtaining accurate individual exposure measurements can be costly and challenging. Thus, these measurements are often subject to error. Regression calibration with a validation study is widely employed as a study design and analysis method to correct for measurement error in the main study due to its broad applicability and simple implementation. However, relying on an external validation study to assess the measurement error process carries the risk of introducing bias into the analysis. Specifically, if the parameters of regression calibration model estimated from the external validation study are not transportable to the main study, the subsequent estimated parameter describing the exposure-disease association will be biased. In this work, we improve the regression calibration method for linear regression models using an external validation study. Unlike the original approach, our proposed method ensures that the regression calibration model is transportable by estimating the parameters in the measurement error generating process using the external validation study and obtaining the remaining parameter values in the regression calibration model directly from the main study. This guarantees that parameter values in the regression calibration model will be applicable to the main study. We derived the theoretical properties of our proposed method. The simulation results show that the proposed method effectively reduces bias and maintains nominal confidence interval coverage. We applied this method to data from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (main study) and the Men's Lifestyle Validation Study (external validation study) to assess the effects of dietary intake on body weight.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zexiang Li, Donna Spiegelman, Molin Wang, Zuoheng Wang, Xin Zhou. 2025-03-29. Improving Transportability of Regression Calibration Under the Main/External Validation Study Design. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc%2Fujag019

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗