SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2504.01168

LimTDD: A Compact Decision Diagram Integrating Tensor and Local Invertible Map Representations

Abstract

Tensor networks serve as a powerful tool for efficiently representing and manipulating high-dimensional data in applications such as quantum physics, machine learning, and data compression. Tensor Decision Diagrams (TDDs) offer an efficient framework for tensor representation by leveraging decision diagram techniques. However, the current implementation of TDDs and other decision diagrams fail to exploit tensor isomorphisms, limiting their compression potential. This paper introduces Local Invertible Map Tensor Decision Diagrams (LimTDDs), an extension of TDDs that incorporates local invertible maps (LIMs) to achieve more compact representations. Unlike LIMDD, which uses Pauli operators for quantum states, LimTDD employs the $XP$-stabilizer group, enabling broader applicability across tensor-based tasks. We present efficient algorithms for normalization, slicing, addition, and contraction, critical for tensor network applications. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that LimTDDs achieve greater compactness than TDDs and, in best-case scenarios and for quantum state representations, offer exponential compression advantages over both TDDs and LIMDDs. Experimental results in quantum circuit tensor computation and simulation confirm LimTDD's superior efficiency. Open-source code is available at https://github.com/Veriqc/LimTDD.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xin Hong, Aochu Dai, Dingchao Gao, Sanjiang Li, Zhengfeng Ji, Mingsheng Ying. 2025-04-01. LimTDD: A Compact Decision Diagram Integrating Tensor and Local Invertible Map Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01168

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS