Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.02421

Balanced connected partitions of edge-weighted graphs: Hardness and solving methods

Morteza Davari·Phablo F. S. Moura·Hande Yaman
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The balanced connected $k$-partition problem (\textsc{bcp}) is a classic problem, which consists in partitioning the set of vertices of a vertex-weighted connected graph into a collection of~$k$ classes such that each class induces a connected subgraph of \emph{roughly} the same weight. In this study, we investigate edge-weighted variants of $\textsc{bcp}$, where we are given a connected graph $G$, $k \in \Z_\ge$, and an edge-weight function $w \colon E(G)\to\Q_\ge$, and the goal is to compute a spanning $k$-forest~$\mathcal{T}$ of $G$ (i.e., a forest with exactly $k$ trees) that minimizes the weight of the heaviest tree in~$\mathcal{T}$ in the min-max version, or maximizes the weight of the lightest tree in~$\mathcal{T}$ in the max-min version. We show that both versions of this problem are $\NP$-hard on complete graphs with $k=2$, unweighted split graphs, and unweighted bipartite graphs with $k\geq 2$ fixed. Moreover, we prove that these problems do not admit subexponential-time algorithms, unless the Exponential-Time Hypothesis fails. We focus on the min-max version and devise a tight $k$-approximation algorithm, compact and non-compact integer linear programming formulations, branch and cut, and branch and price algorithms. Finally, we present the outcomes of an experimental study on the performances of different solution methods. The source code of the complete implementation of the proposed algorithms is also available.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Morteza Davari, Phablo F. S. Moura, Hande Yaman. 2025-04-03. Balanced connected partitions of edge-weighted graphs: Hardness and solving methods. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02421

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗