Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.03910

Tight analysis of the primal-dual method for edge-covering pliable set families

Zeev Nutov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A classic result of Williamson, Goemans, Mihail, and Vazirani [STOC 1993: 708-717] states that the problem of covering an uncrossable set family by a min-cost edge set admits approximation ratio $2$, by a primal-dual algorithm with a reverse delete phase. Bansal, Cheriyan, Grout, and Ibrahimpur [ICALP 2023: 15:1-15:19] showed that this algorithm achieves approximation ratio $16$ for a larger class of so called $\gamma$-pliable set families, that have much weaker uncrossing properties. The approximation ratio $16$ was improved to $10$ by the author [WAOA 2025: 151-166]. Recently, Bansal [arXiv:2308.15714] stated approximation ratio $8$ for $\gamma$-pliable families and an improved approximation ratio $5$ for an important particular case of the family of cuts of size $<k$ of a graph $H$, but his proof has an error. We will improve the approximation ratio to $7$ for the former case and give a simple proof of approximation ratio $6$ for the latter case. Furthermore, if $H$ is $\lambda$-edge-connected then we will show a slightly better approximation ratio $6-\frac{1}{\beta+1}$, where $\beta=\left\lfloor\frac{k-1}{\lceil(\lambda+1)/2\rceil}\right\rfloor$. Our analysis is supplemented by examples showing that these approximation ratios are tight for the primal-dual algorithm.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zeev Nutov. 2025-04-04. Tight analysis of the primal-dual method for edge-covering pliable set families. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03910

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗