Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.10664

A cute proof that makes $e$ natural

Po-Shen Loh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The number $e$ has rich connections throughout mathematics, and has the honor of being the base of the natural logarithm. However, most students finish secondary school (and even university) without suitably memorable intuition for why $e$'s various mathematical properties are related. This article presents a solution. Various proofs for all of the mathematical facts in this article have been well-known for years. This exposition contributes a short, conceptual, intuitive, and visual proof (comprehensible to Pre-Calculus students) of the equivalence of two of the most commonly-known properties of $e$, connecting the continuously-compounded-interest limit $\big(1 + \frac{1}{n}\big)^n$ to the fact that $e^x$ is its own derivative. The exposition further deduces a host of commonly-taught properties of $e$, while minimizing pre-requisite knowledge, so that this article can be practically used for developing secondary school curricula. Since $e$ is such a well-trodden concept, it is hard to imagine that our visual proof is new, but it certainly is not widely known. The author checked 100 books across 7 countries, as well as YouTube videos totaling over 25 million views, and still has not found this method taught anywhere. This article seeks to popularize the 3-page explanation of $e$, while providing a unified, practical, and open-access reference for teaching about $e$.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Po-Shen Loh. 2025-04-14. A cute proof that makes $e$ natural. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10664

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗