Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.11398

Breaking a Long-Standing Barrier: 2-$\varepsilon$ Approximation for Steiner Forest

Ali Ahmadi·Iman Gholami·MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi·Peyman Jabbarzade·Mohammad Mahdavi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Steiner Forest problem, also known as the Generalized Steiner Tree problem, is a fundamental optimization problem on edge-weighted graphs where, given a set of vertex pairs, the goal is to select a minimum-cost subgraph such that each pair is connected. This problem generalizes the Steiner Tree problem, first introduced in 1811, for which the best known approximation factor is 1.39 [Byrka, Grandoni, Rothvo{\ss}, and Sanit\`a, 2010] (Best Paper award, STOC 2010). The celebrated work of [Agrawal, Klein, and Ravi, 1989] (30-Year Test-of-Time award, STOC 2023), along with refinements by [Goemans and Williamson, 1992] (SICOMP'95), established a 2-approximation for Steiner Forest over 35 years ago. Jain's (FOCS'98) pioneering iterative rounding techniques later extended these results to higher connectivity settings. Despite the long-standing importance of this problem, breaking the approximation factor of 2 has remained a major challenge, raising suspicions that achieving a better factor -- similar to Vertex Cover -- might indeed be hard. Notably, fundamental works, including those by Gupta and Kumar (STOC'15) and Gro{\ss} et al. (ITCS'18), introduced 96- and 69-approximation algorithms, possibly with the hope of paving the way for a breakthrough in achieving a constant-factor approximation below 2 for the Steiner Forest problem. In this paper, we break the approximation barrier of 2 by designing a novel deterministic algorithm that achieves a $2 - 10^{-11}$ approximation for this fundamental problem. As a key component of our approach, we also introduce a novel dual-based local search algorithm for the Steiner Tree problem with an approximation guarantee of $1.943$, which is of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ali Ahmadi, Iman Gholami, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Peyman Jabbarzade, Mohammad Mahdavi. 2025-04-15. Breaking a Long-Standing Barrier: 2-$\varepsilon$ Approximation for Steiner Forest. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11398

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗