Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.14823

Optimal Repurchasing Contract Design for Efficient Utilization of Computing Resources

Zhengyan Deng·Yusen Zheng·Chenliang Sheng·Shaowen Qin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The rapid advancement of AI and other emerging technologies has triggered exponential growth in computing resources demand. Faced with prohibitive infrastructure costs for large-scale computing clusters, users are increasingly resorting to leased computing resources from third-party providers. However, prevalent overestimation of operational requirements frequently leads to substantial underutilization of the computing resources. To mitigate such inefficiency, we propose a contract-based incentive framework for computing resources repurchasing. Comparing to auction mechanisms, our design enables providers to reclaim and reallocate surplus computing resources through market-driven incentives. Our framework operates in a multi-parameter environment where both clients' idle resource capacities and their unit valuations of retained resources are private information, posing a significant challenge to contract design. Two scenarios are considered based on whether all clients possess the same amount of idle resource capacity. By transforming the contract design problem into solving a mathematical program, we obtain the optimal contracts for each scenario, which can maximize the utility of computing resources providers while ensuring the requirements of incentive compatibility (IC) and individual rationality (IR). This innovative design not only provides an effective approach to reduce the inefficient utilization of computing resources, but also establishes a market-oriented paradigm for sustainable computing ecosystems.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zhengyan Deng, Yusen Zheng, Chenliang Sheng, Shaowen Qin. 2025-04-21. Optimal Repurchasing Contract Design for Efficient Utilization of Computing Resources. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14823

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗