Deterministic $k$-Median Clustering in Near-Optimal Time

Martín Costa; Ermiya Farokhnejad

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.15115

Deterministic $k$-Median Clustering in Near-Optimal Time

Martín Costa·Ermiya Farokhnejad

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The metric $k$-median problem is a textbook clustering problem. As input, we are given a metric space $V$ of size $n$ and an integer $k$, and our task is to find a subset $S \subseteq V$ of at most $k$ `centers' that minimizes the total distance from each point in $V$ to its nearest center in $S$. Mettu and Plaxton [UAI'02] gave a randomized algorithm for $k$-median that computes a $O(1)$-approximation in $\tilde O(nk)$ time. They also showed that any algorithm for this problem with a bounded approximation ratio must have a running time of $\Omega(nk)$. Thus, the running time of their algorithm is optimal up to polylogarithmic factors. For deterministic $k$-median, Guha et al.~[FOCS'00] gave an algorithm that computes a $\text{poly}(\log (n/k))$-approximation in $\tilde O(nk)$ time, where the degree of the polynomial in the approximation is unspecified. To the best of our knowledge, this remains the state-of-the-art approximation of any deterministic $k$-median algorithm with this running time. This leads us to the following natural question: What is the best approximation of a deterministic $k$-median algorithm with near-optimal running time? We make progress in answering this question by giving a deterministic algorithm that computes a $O(\log(n/k))$-approximation in $\tilde O(nk)$ time. We also provide a lower bound showing that any deterministic algorithm with this running time must have an approximation ratio of $\Omega(\log n/(\log k + \log \log n))$, establishing a gap between the randomized and deterministic settings for $k$-median.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Martín Costa, Ermiya Farokhnejad. 2025-04-21. Deterministic $k$-Median Clustering in Near-Optimal Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15115

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗