Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.15568

Is Learning Effective in Dynamic Strategic Interactions? Evidence from Stackelberg Games

Michael Albert·Quinlan Dawkins·Minbiao Han·Haifeng Xu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In many settings of interest, a policy is set by one party, the leader, in order to influence the action of another party, the follower, where the follower's response is determined by some private information. A natural question to ask is, can the leader improve their strategy by learning about the unknown follower through repeated interactions? A well known folk theorem from dynamic pricing, a special case of this leader-follower setting, would suggest that the leader cannot learn effectively from the follower when the follower is fully strategic, leading to a large literature on learning in strategic settings that relies on limiting the strategic space of the follower in order to provide positive results. In this paper, we study dynamic Bayesian Stackelberg games, where a leader and a \emph{fully strategic} follower interact repeatedly, with the follower's type unknown. Contrary to existing results, we show that the leader can improve their utility through learning in repeated play. Using a novel average-case analysis, we demonstrate that learning is effective in these settings, without needing to weaken the follower's strategic space. Importantly, this improvement is not solely due to the leader's ability to commit, nor does learning simply substitute for communication between the parties. We provide an algorithm, based on a mixed-integer linear program, to compute the optimal leader policy in these games and develop heuristic algorithms to approximate the optimal dynamic policy more efficiently. Through simulations, we compare the efficiency and runtime of these algorithms against static policies.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Albert, Quinlan Dawkins, Minbiao Han, Haifeng Xu. 2025-04-22. Is Learning Effective in Dynamic Strategic Interactions? Evidence from Stackelberg Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15568

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗