Towards True Work-Efficiency in Parallel Derandomization: MIS, Maximal Matching, and Hitting Set

Mohsen Ghaffari; Christoph Grunau

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.15700

Towards True Work-Efficiency in Parallel Derandomization: MIS, Maximal Matching, and Hitting Set

Mohsen Ghaffari·Christoph Grunau

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Derandomization is one of the classic topics studied in the theory of parallel computations, dating back to the early 1980s. Despite much work, all known techniques lead to deterministic algorithms that are not work-efficient. For instance, for the well-studied problem of maximal independent set -- e.g., [Karp, Wigderson STOC'84; Luby STOC' 85; Luby FOCS'88] -- state-of-the-art deterministic algorithms require at least $m \cdot poly(\log n)$ work, where $m$ and $n$ denote the number of edges and vertices. Hence, these deterministic algorithms will remain slower than their trivial sequential counterparts unless we have at least $poly(\log n)$ processors. In this paper, we present a generic parallel derandomization technique that moves exponentially closer to work-efficiency. The method iteratively rounds fractional solutions representing the randomized assignments to integral solutions that provide deterministic assignments, while maintaining certain linear or quadratic objective functions, and in an \textit{essentially work-efficient} manner. As example end-results, we use this technique to obtain deterministic algorithms with $m \cdot poly(\log \log n)$ work and $poly(\log n)$ depth for problems such as maximal independent set, maximal matching, and hitting set.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Mohsen Ghaffari, Christoph Grunau. 2025-04-22. Towards True Work-Efficiency in Parallel Derandomization: MIS, Maximal Matching, and Hitting Set. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15700

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗