SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2504.16741

Search Timelines: Visualizing Search History to Enable Cross-Session Exploratory Search

Abstract

Purpose: The timespan over which exploratory searching can occur, as well as the scope and volume of the search activities undertaken, can make it difficult for searchers to remember key details about their search activities. These difficulties are present both in the midst of searching as well as when resuming a search that spans multiple sessions. In this paper, we present a search interface design and prototype implementation to support cross-session exploratory search in a public digital library context. Methods: Search Timelines provides a visualization of current and past search activities via a dynamic timeline of the search activity (queries and saved resources). This timeline is presented at two levels of detail. An Overview Timeline is provided alongside the search results in a typical search engine results page design. A Detailed Timeline is provided in the workspace, where searchers can review the history of their search activities and their saved resources. A controlled laboratory study (n=32) was conducted to compare this approach to a baseline interface modelled after a typical public digital library search/workspace interface. Results: Participants who used Search Timelines reported higher levels of user engagement, usability, and perceived knowledge gain, during an initial search session and when resuming the search after a 7-8 day interval. This came at the expense of the searchers taking more time to complete the search task, which we view as positive evidence of engagement in cross-session exploratory search processes. Conclusion: Search Timelines serves as an example of how lightweight visualization approaches can be used to enhance typical search interface designs to support exploratory search. The results highlight the value of providing persistent representations of past search activities within the search interface.}

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Orland Hoeber, Md Nazmul Islam, Miriam Boon, Dale Storie, Veronica Ramshaw. 2025-04-23. Search Timelines: Visualizing Search History to Enable Cross-Session Exploratory Search. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16741

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

ShellVis: Sandboxed Live Programming for Shell Scripts

Live programming provides visibility to programmers by running and tracing programs as they are edited. However, for programs with potentially harmful side effects, liveness can turn mistakes into disasters. We propose enabling live programming in environments with side effects via sandboxing: confining effects to a simulation of the true environment. We apply sandboxed live programming in the challenging context of shell scripting: a ubiquitous and powerful---yet notoriously opaque and error-prone---tool. ShellVis provides line-by-line feedback on a shell script's run-time behavior, with file operations sandboxed via a safe overlay of the file system. A qualitative user evaluation finds ShellVis to be helpful to participants, replacing tedious existing practices and instilling confidence. Participant responses also reveal areas for future research, particularly bridging the gulf of execution alongside the gulf of evaluation. ShellVis serves as a case study of how sandboxing can bring live-programming techniques into the many real-world programming contexts where side effects are important.

cs.HC

Visual-Motion-Induced Modulation of Pedestrian Trajectories Using Spatially Distributed Multi-Display Signage in Public Spaces

Multi-display signage (MDS), now ubiquitous in urban environments, has the potential to influence human behavior and experience in public spaces. However, despite its unique capability to present spatially distributed dynamic visual stimuli, its current use is mainly limited to advertising. In this study, we propose a perception-based approach for laterally modulating pedestrian trajectories as a nonverbal means of guiding pedestrians in public spaces. The approach is motivated by vection, the illusion of self-motion, and uses laterally moving monochrome stripes, a standard stimulus in vection research, presented across spatially distributed displays to elicit postural responses that may bias pedestrian trajectories. We evaluated the approach through a controlled laboratory experiment and a real-world field deployment involving actual pedestrian flows in a national museum. The laboratory experiment examined whether the MDS setup induced trajectory shifts in the direction predicted by prior research on the behavioral effects of vection. The field deployment investigated whether comparable effects would emerge in aggregate pedestrian behavior during unconstrained movement under conditions closer to those of urban public spaces. In the laboratory, full-screen motion significantly biased walking trajectories in the direction of visual motion, whereas partial-stripe motion produced no significant directional effect. In the field deployment, opposing full-screen motion conditions produced direction-consistent differences in aggregate pedestrian positions. The field results, observed despite the substantial variability in real-world pedestrian flows, extend the controlled laboratory findings and provide ecologically valid evidence supporting practical MDS-based pedestrian modulation in public settings. The results further suggest that sufficient visual-motion coverage may be important.

cs.HC

How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding

The utility of AI in multi-coder qualitative coding has been widely discussed, yet little empirical evidence exists to delineate the contexts in which it performs reliably. We address this gap by quantifying the effectiveness of multi-agent LLM coding across varied qualitative datasets, revealing key contextual and structural factors that mediate coding outcomes. We developed a literature-informed baseline pipeline that enables AI agents to independently code, debate, and reconcile disagreements. Results revealed that coding accuracy depends on factors such as codebook length, qualitative data similarity, and agent disagreement. Notably, intense and unresolved debates between agents led to higher accuracy. Our analysis showed that while LLMs emulate many human discussion behaviors, they lack adaptive responsiveness to context. From these findings, we offer design recommendations for building automated coding systems. Our open-source AI discussion dataset and methodological framework lay the groundwork for advancing the design of AI-mediated automated thematic analysis.

cs.HC