SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2504.16901

Characterizing Fragments of Collection in Set Theory by Model-Theoretic Properties

Abstract

We compare the model theory of the weak set theory $\mathsf{DB}_0$ with that of the algebraic theory $\mathsf{PA}^-$. Every model of $\mathsf{DB}_0$ has a proper taller* end extension with an exact transitive cover, paralleling the corresponding end-extension result for $\mathsf{PA}^-$. More substantially, we prove that $\mathsf{DB}_0$ and $\mathsf{PA}^-$ are mutually interpretable. The new direction interprets $\mathsf{DB}_0$ in $I\Delta_0+\Omega_1$ by finite rooted acyclic graphs; bisimulation supplies equality, and bounded truth on the graphs supplies $\Delta_0$-Separation. We then characterize fragments of set-theoretic Collection by Gaifman-style splitting and cofinal elementarity. Finally, we separate two end-extension mechanisms. Without a resolution, Kaufmann's construction characterizes the relevant Collection fragments for countable and locally for $\aleph_1$-like models. With a strict transitive resolution, Power Set, Infinity, and strong Collection, a finite-strength Keisler--Morley construction gives $\Sigma_N$-elementary taller* end extensions whose output retains strong $\Sigma_{N-2}$-Collection. The proof is choice-free inside the model and also recovers the classical $\mathsf{ZF}$ theorem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junhong Chen. 2025-04-23. Characterizing Fragments of Collection in Set Theory by Model-Theoretic Properties. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16901

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO