SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2504.17868

Color Fault-Tolerant Distance Preservers: \~{O}ptimal Size in Conditionally \~{O}ptimal Time

Abstract

We revisit the problem of fault-tolerant (FT) distance preservers, when failure events in the network admit a form of correlation modeled as color faults. FT distance preservers are sparse subgraphs that preserve distances between specified pairs of vertices, even after some edge or vertex failures occur. In the classical fault model, any set of at most $k$ edges or vertices might fail (where $k \geq 1$ is a given parameter). Despite extensive research, the classical model admits significant and tantalizing gaps, both in terms of sparsity bounds and of algorithmic efficiency. In this work, we study the problem in the recently introduced color fault-tolerant (CFT) model: the given graph $G=(V,E)$ has arbitrary colors on its edges/vertices where each color appears at most $k$ times, and is susceptible to color faults, where the failure of color $c$ causes all the $c$-colored elements to crash. Our main contribution is in the multi-source setting, where $G$ has a source-set $S \subseteq V$, and the CFT preserver should preserve $S \times V$ distances under any single color fault. We show the following results (where $n = |V|$, $m = |E|$): - There exists a CFT distance preserver $H$ of $G$ with $\tilde{O}(n^{2 - \frac{1}{k+1}} \cdot |S|^{\frac{1}{k+1}} )$ edges. - The above sparsity bound is worst-case optimal up to polylogarithmic terms. - There is a combinatorial randomized algorithm that produces a preserver $H$ whose size meets the above optimal sparsity bound, with running time of $\tilde{O}(m \cdot n^{1 - \frac{1}{k+1}} \cdot |S|^{\frac{1}{k+1}})$. - The above running time is conditionally optimal: a polynomial improvement would refute the combinatorial Boolean Matrix Multiplication (BMM) conjecture. Furthermore, the running time remains optimal even if we only require mild sparsification to $m^{1-\epsilon}$ edges.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Merav Parter, Asaf Petruschka. 2025-04-24. Color Fault-Tolerant Distance Preservers: \~{O}ptimal Size in Conditionally \~{O}ptimal Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17868

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS