SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2504.20619

Breaking the Barrier of Self-Concordant Barriers: Faster Interior Point Methods for M-Matrices

Abstract

We study two fundamental optimization problems: (1) scaling a symmetric positive definite matrix by a positive diagonal matrix so that the resulting matrix has row and column sums equal to 1; and (2) minimizing a quadratic function subject to hard non-negativity constraints. Both problems lend themselves to efficient algorithms based on interior point methods (IPMs). For general instances, standard self-concordance theory places a limit on the iteration complexity of these methods at $\widetilde{O}\left(n^{1/2}\right)$, where $n$ denotes the matrix dimension. We show via an amortized analysis that, when the input matrix is an M-matrix, an IPM with adaptive step sizes solves both problems in only $\widetilde{O}\left(n^{1/3}\right)$ iterations. As a corollary, using fast Laplacian solvers, we obtain an $\ell_{2}$ flow diffusion algorithm with depth $\widetilde{O}\left(n^{1/3}\right)$ and work $\widetilde{O}$$\left(n^{1/3}\cdot\text{nnz}\right)$. This result marks a significant instance in which a standard log-barrier IPM permits provably fewer than $\Theta\left(n^{1/2}\right)$ iterations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Adrian Vladu. 2025-04-29. Breaking the Barrier of Self-Concordant Barriers: Faster Interior Point Methods for M-Matrices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20619

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS