SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2504.20795

Effective Index Construction Algorithm for Optimal $(k,\eta)$-cores Computation

Abstract

Computing $(k,\eta)$-cores from uncertain graphs is a fundamental problem in uncertain graph analysis. UCF-Index is the state-of-the-art resolution to support $(k,\eta)$-core queries, allowing the $(k,\eta)$-core for any combination of $k$ and $\eta$ to be computed in an optimal time. However, this index constructed by current algorithm is usually incorrect. During decomposition, the key is to obtain the $k$-probabilities of its neighbors when the vertex with minimum $k$-probability is deleted. Current method uses recursive floating-point division to update it, which can lead to serious errors. We propose a correct and efficient index construction algorithm to address this issue. Firstly, we propose tight bounds on the $k$-probabilities of the vertices that need to be updated, and the accurate $k$-probabilities are recalculated in an on-demand manner. Secondly, vertices partitioning and progressive refinement strategy is devised to search the vertex with the minimum $k$-probability, thereby reducing initialization overhead for each $k$ and avoiding unnecessary recalculations. Finally, extensive experiments demonstrate the efficiency and scalability of our approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shengli Sun, Peng Xu, Guanming Jiang, Philip S. Yu, Yi Li. 2025-04-29. Effective Index Construction Algorithm for Optimal $(k,\eta)$-cores Computation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20795

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS