SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2505.00282

A Unifying Framework for Robust and Efficient Inference with Unstructured Data

Abstract

To analyze unstructured data (text, images, audio, video), economists typically first extract low-dimensional structured features with a neural network. Neural networks do not make generically unbiased predictions, and biases will propagate to estimators that use their predictions. While structured variables extracted from unstructured data have traditionally been treated as proxies - implicitly accepting arbitrary measurement error - this poses various challenges in an era where constantly evolving AI can cheaply extract data. Researcher degrees of freedom (e.g., the choice of neural network architecture, training data or prompts, and numerous implementation details) raise concerns about p-hacking and how to best show robustness, the frequent deprecation of proprietary neural networks complicates reproducibility, and researchers need a principled way to determine how accurate predictions need to be before making costly investments to improve them. To address these challenges, this study develops MAR-S (Missing At Random Structured Data), a semiparametric missing data framework that enables unbiased, efficient, and robust inference with unstructured data, by correcting for neural network prediction error with a validation sample. MAR-S synthesizes and extends existing methods for debiased inference using machine learning predictions and connects them to familiar problems such as causal inference, highlighting valuable parallels. We develop robust and efficient estimators for both descriptive and causal estimands and address inference with aggregated and transformed neural network predictions, a common scenario outside the existing literature.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jacob Carlson, Melissa Dell. 2025-05-01. A Unifying Framework for Robust and Efficient Inference with Unstructured Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00282

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM