SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2505.00524

Recursive inseparability of classical theories of a binary predicate and non-classical logics of a unary predicate

Abstract

The paper considers algorithmic properties of classical and non-classical first-order logics and theories in bounded languages. The main idea is to prove the undecidability of various fragments of classical and non-classical first-order logics and theories indirectly, by extracting it as a consequence of the recursive inseparability of special problems associated with them. First, we propose a domino problem, which makes it possible to catch the recursive inseparability of two sets. Second, using this problem, we prove that the classical first-order logic of a binary predicate and the theory of its finite models where the predicate is symmetric and irreflexive are recursively inseparable in a language with a single binary predicate letter and three variables (without constants and equality). Third, we prove, for an infinite class of logics, that the monadic fragment of a modal predicate logic and the logic of the class of its finite Kripke frames are recursively inseparable in languages with a single unary predicate letter and two individual variables; the same result is obtained if we replace the condition of finiteness of frames with the condition of finiteness of domains allowed in frames. Forth, we expand the results to a wide class of superintuitionistic predicate logics. In particular, it is proved that the positive fragments of the intuitionistic predicate logic and the logic of the class of finite intuitionistic Kripke frames are recursively inseparable in the language with a single unary predicate letter and two individual variables. The technique used and the results obtained allow us to answer some additional questions about the decidability of special monadic fragments of some modal and superintuitionistic predicate logics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mikhail Rybakov. 2025-05-01. Recursive inseparability of classical theories of a binary predicate and non-classical logics of a unary predicate. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00524

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO