Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.01603

Unlocking True Elasticity for the Cloud-Native Era with Dandelion

Tom Kuchler·Pinghe Li·Yazhuo Zhang·Lazar Cvetković·Boris Goranov·Tobias Stocker·Leon Thomm·Simone Kalbermatter·Tim Notter·Andrea Lattuada·Ana Klimovic
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Elasticity is fundamental to cloud computing, as it enables quickly allocating resources to match the demand of each workload as it arrives, rather than pre-provisioning resources to meet performance objectives. However, even serverless platforms -- which boot sandboxes in 10s to 100s of milliseconds -- are not sufficiently elastic to avoid over-provisioning expensive resources. Today's FaaS platforms rely on pre-provisioning many idle sandboxes in memory to reduce the occurrence of slow, cold starts. A key obstacle for high elasticity is booting a guest OS and configuring features like networking in sandboxes, which are required to expose an isolated POSIX-like interface to user functions. Our key insight is that redesigning the interface for applications in the cloud-native era enables co-designing a much more efficient and elastic execution system. Now is a good time to rethink cloud abstractions as developers are building applications to be cloud-native. Cloud-native applications typically consist of user-provided compute logic interacting with cloud services (for storage, AI inference, query processing, etc) exposed over REST APIs. Hence, we propose Dandelion, an elastic cloud platform with a declarative programming model that expresses applications as DAGs of pure compute functions and higher-level communication functions. Dandelion can securely execute untrusted user compute functions in lightweight sandboxes that cold start in hundreds of microseconds, since pure functions do not rely on extra software environments such as a guest OS. Dandelion makes it practical to boot a sandbox on-demand for each request, decreasing performance variability by two to three orders of magnitude compared to Firecracker and reducing committed memory by 96% on average when running the Azure Functions trace.

Explore related subjects

cs.DCcs.OS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tom Kuchler, Pinghe Li, Yazhuo Zhang, Lazar Cvetković, Boris Goranov, Tobias Stocker, Leon Thomm, Simone Kalbermatter, Tim Notter, Andrea Lattuada, Ana Klimovic. 2025-05-02. Unlocking True Elasticity for the Cloud-Native Era with Dandelion. https://doi.org/10.1145/3731569.3764803

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗