Equalizing Closeness Centralities via Edge Additions

Alex Crane; Sorelle A. Friedler; Mihir Patel; Blair D. Sullivan

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.06222

Equalizing Closeness Centralities via Edge Additions

Alex Crane·Sorelle A. Friedler·Mihir Patel·Blair D. Sullivan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Graph modification problems with the goal of optimizing some measure of a given node's network position have a rich history in the algorithms literature. Less commonly explored are modification problems with the goal of equalizing positions, though this class of problems is well-motivated from the perspective of equalizing social capital, i.e., algorithmic fairness. In this work, we study how to add edges to make the closeness centralities of a given pair of nodes more equal. We formalize two versions of this problem: Closeness Ratio Improvement, which aims to maximize the ratio of closeness centralities between two specified nodes, and Closeness Gap Minimization, which aims to minimize the absolute difference of centralities. We show that both problems are $\textsf{NP}$-hard, and for Closeness Ratio Improvement we present a quasilinear-time $\frac{6}{11}$-approximation, complemented by a bicriteria inapproximability bound. In contrast, we show that Closeness Gap Minimization admits no multiplicative approximation unless $\textsf{P} = \textsf{NP}$. We conclude with a discussion of open directions for this style of problem, including several natural generalizations.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.SI

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Alex Crane, Sorelle A. Friedler, Mihir Patel, Blair D. Sullivan. 2025-05-09. Equalizing Closeness Centralities via Edge Additions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06222

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗