SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2505.13552

New Sorting Algorithm Wave Sort (W-Sort)

Abstract

Modern comparison sorts like quicksort suffer from performance inconsistencies due to suboptimal pivot selection, leading to $(O(N^2))$ worst-case complexity, while in-place merge sort variants face challenges with data movement overhead. We introduce Wave Sort, a novel in-place sorting algorithm that addresses these limitations through a dynamic pivot selection strategy. Wave Sort iteratively expands a sorted region and selects pivots from this growing sorted portion to partition adjacent unsorted data. This approach ensures robust pivot selection irrespective of dataset size, guarantees a logarithmic recursion stack depth, and enables efficient in-place sorting. Our analysis shows a best comparison complexity of $(N-1)$, average comparison complexity close to $(\log_2(N)!)$, and worst-case comparison complexity bounded by $(O(N(\log(N))^2))$ with a small constant factor, which could be reduced to $(O(N\log(N)))$ with hybrid sorting. The algorithm can be easily expanded to be hybridized with other sorting algorithms. Experimental results demonstrate that Wave Sort requires significantly fewer comparisons than quicksort on average (approximately 24% less) and performs close to the theoretical minimum $(\log_2(N)!)$. Wave Sort offers a compelling alternative for applications demanding consistent, predictable, and in-place sorting performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jia Xu Wei. 2025-05-19. New Sorting Algorithm Wave Sort (W-Sort). https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13552

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS