SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2505.17934

Evaluating the impact of the L3 cache size of AMD EPYC CPUs on the performance of CFD applications

Abstract

In this work, the authors focus on assessing the impact of the AMD EPYC processor architecture on the performance of CFD applications. Several generations of architectures were analyzed, such as Rome, Milan, Milan X, Genoa, Genoa X and Bergamo, characterized by a different number of cores (64-128), L3 cache size (256 - 1152 MB) and RAM type (8-channel DDR4 or 12-channel DDR5). The research was conducted based on the OpenFOAM application using two memory-bound models: motorBike and Urban Air Pollution. In order to compare the performance of applications on different architectures, the FVOPS (Finite VOlumes solved Per Second) metric was introduced, which allows a direct comparison of the performance on the different architectures. It was noticed that local maximum performance occurs in the grid sizes assigned to the processing process, which is related to individual processor attributes. Additionally, the behavior of the models was analyzed in detail using the software profiling analysis tool AMD uProf to reveal the applications' interaction with the hardware. It enabled fine-tuned monitoring of the CPU's behaviours and identified potential inefficiencies in AMD EPYC CPUs. Particular attention was paid to the effective use of L2 and L3 cache memory in the context of their capacity and the bandwidth of memory channels, which are a key factor in memory-bound applications. Processor features were analyzed from a cross-platform perspective, which allowed for the determination of metrics of particular importance in terms of their impact on the performance achieved by CFD applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marcin Lawenda, Łukasz Szustak, László Környei, Flavio Cesar Cunha Galeazzo, Paweł Bratek. 2025-05-23. Evaluating the impact of the L3 cache size of AMD EPYC CPUs on the performance of CFD applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

PASCAL: A Phase-Aware Shared-Cache Model for Parallel Scans

In modern AI Accelerators and GPGPUs, many concurrent cores repeatedly access the same shared data. This pattern occurs in attention, where different query tiles share the same K/V block, GEMM, where every tile in a row reads the same panel, and many other operators. We name this pattern parallel scan. Due to a significant amount of data reuse in this pattern, the cache is expected to capture as much data reuse as possible and largely reduce requests sent to the main memory for both performance and energy consumption concerns. However, in reality, because of the intrinsic asynchrony of multi-cores, the actual cache miss rate and DRAM traffic can be much higher compared to ideal cases. In this paper, we propose PASCAL, a shared-cache model for parallel scans. It is aware of the dynamic feature of progress divergence across multi-cores, correlate the divergence with the combination of different factors such as occupancy, and predicts the cache miss rate before execution. Because prediction needs no target trace, timing, or counters, PASCAL supports design-space exploration at scales where cycle-accurate simulation is impractical, and its policy-independent bound states how much traffic no replacement policy can avoid. A MAPE of 13.84% is achieved in a 60-configuration dataset with various software pipeline depths, occupancies, and memory access data paths on an NVIDIA GB10 GPU, against 44.79% for physical-wave TileSight and 54.16% for exact symbolic SDCM.

cs.PF

Mathematical Modeling of a Cognitive Continuum Digital Shadow for Large-Scale, Cross-Facility Workflows

We present the mathematical foundations of a \emph{Cognitive Continuum Digital Shadow} (CCDS), a decision-support layer between users and the cross-facility infrastructure---instruments, networks, data stores and compute centers---of exascale and post-exascale scientific workflows. The CCDS couples a state-space representation of the continuum with multistage stochastic programming, so that deployment scenarios can be explored and optimized \emph{before} jobs are launched. This allows operators and users to quantify the cost, makespan and energy trade-offs of a workflow under uncertain resource availability, and hedge their decisions accordingly. We formulate the underlying optimization as a multimode, resource-constrained, stochastic supply-chain network design problem and demonstrate it on a realistic genomics workflow scheduled across heterogeneous HPC and data-center resources. This is the first of three papers; the second treats the underlying software architecture and the third reports large-scale use-cases.

cs.PF

RGB Input Pipelines: Throughput, GPU Memory, and Transformation Coverage

An image-augmentation pipeline must deliver a complete batch before a model can use it. We compare seven input paths from five libraries, starting with RGB JPEG files and ending with a synchronized CUDA float16 batch. We manually matched transformation recipes and parameters across libraries to make the workloads as comparable as possible. The experiment uses 57 selected recipes, a batch size of 256, and one NVIDIA L4 machine. Throughput and peak process GPU memory are recorded together in 759 measurements. On the 11 recipes shared by all paths, DALI and AlbumentationsX have median throughputs of 5,029 and 4,679 images/s, with median peak GPU memory of 2,086 and 1,852 MiB. Broader pairwise comparisons favor AlbumentationsX on 26/26 TorchVision recipes, 50/51 Kornia recipes, and 25/26 Pillow recipes. DALI is faster than AlbumentationsX on all 22 shared recipes, with a median throughput ratio of 1.18x. A separate census reports coverage of the 118 entries in a selected AlbumentationsX RGB catalog. The study measures input preparation at fixed settings; it does not measure model training, numerical equivalence, or the best attainable configuration of each library. Benchmark code: https://github.com/albumentations-team/benchmark.

cs.PF