arXiv · 2505.18123
Comment on "Geometry of the Grosse-Wulkenhaar model"
Abstract
We clarify a key point in the geometric reinterpretation of the Grosse$\unicode{x2013}$Wulkenhaar (GW) model proposed in "Geometry of the Grosse-Wulkenhaar model" [JHEP 03 (2010) 053]. Specifically, we show that the analysis in Section 6 was performed not for the actual $\Omega$-term in the GW action, which involves both ordinary and star-products, but for a closely related term containing only star-products. Once corrected, the main conclusion$\unicode{x2014}$relating the harmonic potential term to background curvature$\unicode{x2014}$remains valid, though the parameter identification must be revised. This also resolves a discrepancy concerning the emergence of certain vacuum solutions in the self-dual limit of the model.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Dragan Prekrat. 2025-05-23. Comment on "Geometry of the Grosse-Wulkenhaar model". https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219887826502798
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.