SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2505.22410

Faster Convolutions: Yates and Strassen Revisited

Abstract

Given two vectors $u,v \in \mathbb{Q}^D$ over a finite domain $D$ and a function $f : D\times D\to D$, the convolution problem asks to compute the vector $w \in \mathbb{Q}^D$ whose entries are defined by $w(d) = \sum_{\substack{x,y \in D \\ f(x,y)=d}} u(x)v(y).$ In parameterized and exponential-time algorithms, convolutions on product domains are particularly prominent: Here, a finite domain $B$ and a function $h : B \times B \to B$ are fixed, and convolution is done over the product domain $D = B^k$, using the function $h^k :D \times D\to D$ that applies $h$ coordinate-wise to its input tuples. We present a new perspective on product-domain convolutions through multilinear algebra. This viewpoint streamlines the presentation and analysis of existing algorithms, such as those by van Rooij et al. (ESA 2009). Moreover, using established results from the theory of fast matrix multiplication, we derive improved $O^\ast(|B|^{2\omega/3 \cdot k}) = O(|D|^{1.582})$ time algorithms, improving upon previous upper bounds by Esmer et al. (Algorithmica 86(1), 2024) of the form $c^k |B|^{2k}$ for $c < 1$. Using the setup described in this note, Strassen's asymptotic rank conjecture from algebraic complexity theory would imply quasi-linear $|D|^{1+o(1)}$ time algorithms. This conjecture has recently gained attention in the algorithms community. (Bj\"orklund-Kaski and Pratt, STOC 2024, Bj\"orklund et al., SODA 2025) Our paper is intended as a self-contained exposition for an algorithms audience, and it includes all essential mathematical prerequisites with explicit coordinate-based notation. In particular, we assume no knowledge in abstract algebra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Cornelius Brand, Radu Curticapean, Baitian Li, Kevin Pratt. 2025-05-28. Faster Convolutions: Yates and Strassen Revisited. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22410

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS