SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2506.00031

Non-Hausdorff Incidence Completions of Finite Coverings: Monodromy, Transport, and Defect Posets

Abstract

Let X be a connected Hausdorff surface, let Sigma be a finite subset of X, and let pi from Y to X minus Sigma be a finite sheeted covering. Peripheral monodromy at each marked point determines a finite set of peripheral component germs together with their local degree labels. We introduce incidence completions by adjoining an exceptional fibre at each marked point and prescribing a closed many to many incidence relation between peripheral component germs and exceptional points. The resulting tail saturated topology realizes the prescribed endpoint relation intrinsically. A fixed regular lift extends through a defect precisely when its exceptional value lies in the intersection of the endpoint sets associated with all accumulated peripheral germs. For finite discrete exceptional fibres, a bipartite incidence graph determines the local fundamental group and low dimensional homology. Power probes recover peripheral degrees, while multi arm probes recover higher endpoint intersections and reconstruct the discrete incidence relation by Mobius inversion. For finite exceptional fibres, the completion data are equivalently described by a weighted specialization poset with an antitone incidence map. This yields a structured monodromy classification, automorphism and quotient results, and relation valued and multiplicity valued transport through isolated defects. Varying the exceptional topology and incidence produces a finite defect poset described by a Grothendieck construction. Its total order complex forgets the incidence direction, while vertical incidence complexes and their survival under topology degeneration retain incidence dependent information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abhiram Sripat. 2025-05-26. Non-Hausdorff Incidence Completions of Finite Coverings: Monodromy, Transport, and Defect Posets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00031

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN