SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2506.05495

Learning-Augmented Hierarchical Clustering

Abstract

Hierarchical clustering (HC) is an important data analysis technique in which the goal is to recursively partition a dataset into a tree-like structure while grouping together similar data points at each level of granularity. Unfortunately, for many of the proposed HC objectives, there exist strong barriers to approximation algorithms with the hardness of approximation. Thus, we consider the problem of hierarchical clustering given auxiliary information from natural oracles. Specifically, we focus on a *splitting oracle* which, when provided with a triplet of vertices $(u,v,w)$, answers (possibly erroneously) the pairs of vertices whose lowest common ancestor includes all three vertices in an optimal tree, i.e., identifying which vertex ``splits away'' from the others. Using such an oracle, we obtain the following results: - A polynomial-time algorithm that outputs a hierarchical clustering tree with $O(1)$-approximation to the Dasgupta objective (Dasgupta [STOC'16]). - A near-linear time algorithm that outputs a hierarchical clustering tree with $(1-o(1))$-approximation to the Moseley-Wang objective (Moseley and Wang [NeurIPS'17]). Under the plausible Small Set Expansion Hypothesis, no polynomial-time algorithm can achieve any constant approximation for Dasgupta's objective or $(1-C)$-approximation for the Moseley-Wang objective for some constant $C>0$. As such, our results demonstrate that the splitting oracle enables algorithms to outperform standard HC approaches and overcome hardness constraints. Furthermore, our approaches extend to sublinear settings, in which we show new streaming and PRAM algorithms for HC with improved guarantees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vladimir Braverman, Jon C. Ergun, Chen Wang, Samson Zhou. 2025-06-05. Learning-Augmented Hierarchical Clustering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05495

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS