Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2506.10893

Considerations on Everett J. Nelson's connexive logic

Davide Fazio·Raffaele Mascella
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This work explores Everett John Nelson's connexive logic, outlined in his PhD thesis and partially summarized in his 1930 paper \emph{Intensional Relations}, which is obtained by extending the system $\mathsf{NL}$ (reconstructed by E. Mares and F. Paoli) with a weak conjunction elimination rule explicitly assumed in the former but not in the latter. After a preliminary analysis of Nelson's philosophical ideas, we provide an algebraic-relational semantics for his logic and we investigate possible extensions thereof which are able to cope with Nelson's ideas with much more accuracy than the original system. For example, we will inquire into extensions whose algebraic-relational models are endowed with irreflexive incompatibility relations, or determine a ``weakly'' transitive entailment. Such an investigation will allow us to establish relationships between some of the trademarks of Nelson's thought and concepts of prominent importance for connexive logic, as e.g. Kapsner's strong connexivity and superconnexivity, as well as between the algebraic-relational semantics of Nelsonian logics and ordered structures that have gained great attention over the past years, namely partially ordered involutive residuate groupoids and (non-orthomodular) orthoposets.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Davide Fazio, Raffaele Mascella. 2025-06-12. Considerations on Everett J. Nelson's connexive logic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10893

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗