arXiv · 2506.13964
Comparison of ConvNeXt and Vision-Language Models for Breast Density Assessment in Screening Mammography
Abstract
Mammographic breast density classification is essential for cancer risk assessment but remains challenging due to subjective interpretation and inter-observer variability. This study compares multimodal and CNN-based methods for automated classification using the BI-RADS system, evaluating BioMedCLIP and ConvNeXt across three learning scenarios: zero-shot classification, linear probing with textual descriptions, and fine-tuning with numerical labels. Results show that zero-shot classification achieved modest performance, while the fine-tuned ConvNeXt model outperformed the BioMedCLIP linear probe. Although linear probing demonstrated potential with pretrained embeddings, it was less effective than full fine-tuning. These findings suggest that despite the promise of multimodal learning, CNN-based models with end-to-end fine-tuning provide stronger performance for specialized medical imaging. The study underscores the need for more detailed textual representations and domain-specific adaptations in future radiology applications.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Yusdivia Molina-Román, David Gómez-Ortiz, Ernestina Menasalvas-Ruiz, José Gerardo Tamez-Peña, Alejandro Santos-Díaz. 2025-06-16. Comparison of ConvNeXt and Vision-Language Models for Breast Density Assessment in Screening Mammography. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13964
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.