SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2506.14564

Revisiting a Successful Reduction Rule for Dominating Set

Abstract

Given a graph $G = (V, E)$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, the DominatingSet problem asks for a set $D \subseteq V$ of minimal cardinality such that every vertex either is in $D$ or adjacent to a member of $D$. Although there is little hope for a kernelization algorithm on general graphs due to the W[2]-hardness of DominatingSet, data reduction rules are extensively used in practice. In this context, Rule1 due to Alber, Fellows, and Niedermeier [JACM 2004] has been shown to be very powerful, yet its best-known running time is $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ ($= \mathcal{O}(nm)$) for general graphs. In this work, we propose, to the best of our knowledge, the first $\mathcal{O}(n + m)$-time algorithm for Rule1 on general graphs. We additionally propose simple, but practically significant, extensions to our algorithmic framework to further prune the input instances. We complement our theoretical claims with experiments that confirm the practicality of our approach. On average, we see significant speedups of over one order of magnitude while removing $59.8\times$ more nodes and $410.9\times$ more edges than the original formulation across a large dataset comprised of real-world and synthetic networks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lukas Geis, Alexander Leonhardt, Johannes Meintrup, Ulrich Meyer, Manuel Penschuck, Lukas Retschmeier. 2025-06-17. Revisiting a Successful Reduction Rule for Dominating Set. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14564

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS