SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2506.23561

Towards practical FPRAS for #NFA: Exploiting the Power of Dependence

Abstract

#NFA refers to the problem of counting the words of length $n$ accepted by a non-deterministic finite automaton. #NFA is #P-hard, and although fully-polynomial-time randomized approximation schemes (FPRAS) exist, they are all impractical. The first FPRAS for #NFA had a running time of $\tilde{O}(n^{17}m^{17}\varepsilon^{-14}\log(\delta^{-1}))$, where $m$ is the number of states in the automaton, $\delta \in (0,1]$ is the confidence parameter, and $\varepsilon > 0$ is the tolerance parameter (typically smaller than $1$). The current best FPRAS achieved a significant improvement in the time complexity relative to the first FPRAS and obtained FPRAS with time complexity $\tilde{O}((n^{10}m^2 + n^6m^3)\varepsilon^{-4}\log^2(\delta^{-1}))$. The complexity of the improved FPRAS is still too intimidating to attempt any practical implementation. In this paper, we pursue the quest for practical FPRAS for #NFA by presenting a new algorithm with a time complexity of $O(n^2m^3\log(nm)\varepsilon^{-2}\log(\delta^{-1}))$. Observe that evaluating whether a word of length $n$ is accepted by an NFA has a time complexity of $O(nm^2)$. Therefore, our proposed FPRAS achieves sub-quadratic complexity with respect to membership checks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kuldeep S. Meel, Alexis de Colnet. 2025-06-30. Towards practical FPRAS for #NFA: Exploiting the Power of Dependence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23561

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS