SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2506.24032

Dominating Set Knapsack: Profit Optimization on Dominating Sets

Abstract

In a large-scale network, we want to choose some influential nodes to make a profit by paying some cost within a limited budget so that we do not have to spend more budget on some nodes adjacent to the chosen nodes; our problem is the graph-theoretic representation of it. We define our problem, Dominating Set Knapsack, by attaching the knapsack problem with the dominating set on graphs. Each vertex $v~(\in V) $ is associated with a cost factor $w(v)$ and a profit amount $\alpha(v)$. We aim to choose some vertices within a fixed budget $(s)$ that give maximum profit so that we do not need to choose their 1-hop neighbors. We show that the Dominating Set Knapsack problem is strongly NPC even when restricted to bipartite graphs, but weakly NPC for star graphs. We present a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for trees in time $O(n\cdot min\{s^2, (\alpha(V))^2\})$. We show that Dominating Set Knapsack is unlikely to be Fixed Parameter Tractable (FPT) by proving that it is W[2]-hard parameterized by the solution size. We developed FPT algorithms with running time $O(4^{tw}\cdot n^{O(1)} min\{s^2,{\alpha(V)}^2\})$ and $O(2^{vck-1}\cdot n^{O(1)} min\{s^2,{\alpha(V)}^2\})$, where $tw$ represents the $tw$ of the given graph $G(V,E)$, $vck$ is the solution size of the Vertex Cover Knapsack, $s$ is the capacity or size of the knapsack and $\alpha(V)=\sum_{v\in V}\alpha(v)$. We obtained similar results for other variants $k-$Dominating Set Knapsack and Minimal Dominating Set Knapsack, where $k$ is the size of the dominating set.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sipra Singh. 2025-06-30. Dominating Set Knapsack: Profit Optimization on Dominating Sets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.24032

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS