SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.00930

Subset-Constrained Inverse Matroid Optimization

Abstract

In inverse optimization, the goal is to find a minimum perturbation of weights that makes a prescribed feasible solution optimal. For matroids, the classical inverse problem fixes a target basis. We replace this fixed target by a subset constraint: given a matroid $M=(S,\mathcal{I})$, weights $w$, and a subset $S_0\subseteq S$, we specify how the family of maximum-weight bases relates to the bases contained in $S_0$. We study six natural variants. The positive variants require, respectively, that at least one basis contained in $S_0$ be optimal, that every basis contained in $S_0$ be optimal, or that the optimal bases be exactly the bases contained in $S_0$; we also study the three corresponding negated requirements. This framework captures partial inverse requirements such as forced or forbidden elements, as well as settings where undesirable optimal bases should be excluded. We give a complete classification of these subset-constrained inverse matroid problems under the $\ell_\infty$- and $\ell_1$-norms. Under the $\ell_\infty$-norm, all six variants admit polynomial-time combinatorial algorithms (interpreting the variants with strict inequalities in the natural integral-weight setting). The algorithms are based on matroid exchange, uniform perturbations, and the connected-component structure of the restriction $M|S_0$. Under the $\ell_1$-norm, the picture changes sharply: the variant requiring at least one optimal basis contained in $S_0$ is strongly $\mathsf{NP}$-hard even for graphic matroids, whereas the remaining variants considered here admit polynomial-time algorithms. Thus the subset-constrained setting separates the two norms already for matroids, and even for spanning trees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kristóf Bérczi, Mirabel Mendoza-Cadena, José Soto. 2025-07-01. Subset-Constrained Inverse Matroid Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00930

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS