SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.00978

Decentralised Multi-Manager Fund Framework

Abstract

We introduce a decentralised, algorithmic framework for permissionless, multi-strategy capital allocation via tokenised, automated vaults. The system is designed to function analogously to a multi-strategy asset management company, but implemented entirely on-chain through a modular architecture comprising four interacting layers. The first, the capitalisation layer, composed of vaults that facilitate multi-asset deposits, tokenises investor participation, and specifies high level risk limits and admissible venues for deployment. The second, the strategy layer, enables the submission of strategies by human developers or autonomous agents, creating a decentralised marketplace governed by a validation mechanism incorporating adversarial and gamified elements. The third, the execution layer, operationalises strategy deployment using the host blockchain network's services. The fourth layer, the validated allocation layer, assesses and allocates capital among validated strategies, dynamically rebalancing toward those exhibiting superior risk-adjusted performance. In the framework, each admitted strategy acts as a manager for the "fund", encapsulated in a smart contract vault that issues transferable V-Tokens, conveying fractional ownership of the real-time portfolio operated by the vault. The system is designed to be open to participation by both human and AI agents, who collectively perform the roles of capital allocators, strategy developers, and validated allocators. The resulting structure is a self-regulating asset management ecosystem capable of decentralised, cooperative optimisation across traditional and digital financial domains. This framework is facilitated by a host chain network, which offers native automation and data oracle services enabling vault entities to autonomously operate on-chain, paving the way for being self sufficient in dynamic allocation of capital.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arman Abgaryan, Utkarsh Sharma, Joshua Tobkin. 2025-07-01. Decentralised Multi-Manager Fund Framework. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00978

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AI for AI: Optimizing Additional Infrastructure Build-out to Power Artificial Intelligence Data Centers

The twenty-first century's transformative technology, artificial intelligence, is increasingly constrained by the twentieth century's transformative technology, the electricity grid. Rapid growth in electricity demand from data centers is leading to higher electricity prices, without a compensating supply-side response. We develop a framework linking data-center load growth, available generation capacity, and market-clearing prices to understand this phenomenon. We first analyze a deterministic model to show how differing estimates of demand and supply growth rates affect prices. We then model the expansion of new data centers and their associated electricity demand, together with build-outs of new electricity supply, as stochastic processes,resulting in probabilistic distributions of supply, demand, and prices rather than a single forecast. Finally, we formulate generation expansion as a stochastic control problem in which a revenue-maximizing investor dynamically chooses the intensity of supply-side investments. The analysis highlights a central challenge of the data-center build-out: even when rapid demand growth increases the need for new generation, the uncertainties related to load forecasts, development execution risks, and value cannibalization from overbuilding capacity may weaken incentives to invest at the pace required to keep electricity prices stable.

q-fin.GN

Measuring DeFi Risk

Decentralized finance (DeFi) lending has grown from nonexistent in 2017 to nearly 40 billion US Dollars in deposited funds in May 2022. Using cryptocurrency as collateral, the platforms match speculative margin trading with yield-seeking depositors lending coins pegged to the dollar (stable coins). Depositors receive claims guaranteed by a basket of collateral, akin to new stable coins. We develop a framework requiring only knowledge of aggregate deposits and borrowings to measure overall system risks to lenders and borrowers. Using evidence from major protocols, the measures identify an increase in system fragility beyond prudent levels around mid 2021, with a potential loss of peg for extreme variations in coin prices. Overall, the model offers an easily implementable aggregate risk metric capturing the perspectives of synthetic investors and offers early warning signals as the industry is moving from deposits guaranteed by collateral to fiat money.

q-fin.GN

Historical Reflections on Interest Rates and the Emergence of the Yield Curve

This text grew out of a historical introduction initially written for a study of interest rates in cryptocurrency markets. The difficulty of defining a term structure for a currency without a conventional bond market led naturally to a more fundamental question: under what historical conditions does a yield curve become observable at all? Credit existed long before modern money, and interest-bearing loans are documented as early as ancient Mesopotamia. For much of history, the surviving evidence lacks the institutional features that facilitate reliable comparisons of interest rates by maturity: standardised debt instruments, sufficiently homogeneous borrowers, regular issuance over a range of maturities, observable market prices, and liquid secondary markets. We trace the gradual emergence of these conditions from ancient Mesopotamia, Greece, and Rome, through medieval and early modern Europe, to the development of modern sovereign debt markets in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

q-fin.GN