SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.03195

Existentially closed measure-preserving actions of approximately treeable groups

Abstract

Given a countable group $\Gamma$, letting $\mathcal{K}_\Gamma$ denote the class of {\pmp} actions of $\Gamma$, we study the question of when the model companion of $\mathcal{K}_\Gamma$ exists. Berenstein, Henson, and Ibarluc\'ia showed that the model companion of $\mathcal{K}_\Gamma$ exists when $\Gamma$ is a nonabelian free group on a countable number of generators. We significantly generalize their result by showing that the model companion of $\cal K_\Gamma$ exists whenever $\Gamma$ is an approximately treeable group. The class of approximately treeable groups contain the class of treeable groups as well as the class of universally free groups, that is, the class of groups with the same universal theory as nonabelian free groups. We prove this result using an open mapping characterization of when the model companion exists; moreover, this open mapping characterization provides concrete, ergodic-theoretic axioms for the model companion when it exists. We show how to simplify these axioms in the case of treeable groups, providing an alternate axiomatization for the model companion in the case of the free group, which was first axiomatized by Berenstein, Henson, and Ibarluc\'ia using techniques from model-theoretic stability theory. Along the way, we prove a purely ergodic-theoretic result of independent interest, namely that finitely generated universally free groups (also known as limit groups) have Kechris' property MD. We also show that for groups with Kechris' EMD property, the profinite completion action is existentially closed, and for groups without property (T), the generic existentially closed action is weakly mixing, generalizing results of Berenstein, Henson, and Ibarluc\'ia for the case of nonabelian free groups.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Isaac Goldbring, Brandon Seward, Robin Tucker-Drob. 2025-07-03. Existentially closed measure-preserving actions of approximately treeable groups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03195

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO