SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.04578

Color Distance Oracles and Snippets: Separation Between Exact and Approximate Solutions

Abstract

In the snippets problem, the goal is to preprocess text $T$ so that given two patterns $P_1$ and $P_2$, one can locate the occurrences of the two patterns in $T$ that are closest to each other, or report their distance. Kopelowitz and Krauthgamer [CPM2016] showed upper bound tradeoffs and conditional lower bounds tradeoffs for the snippets problem, by utilizing connections between the snippets problem and the problem of constructing a color distance oracle (CDO), which is a data structure that preprocess a set of points with associated colors so that given two colors $c$ and $c'$ one can quickly find the (distance between the) closest pair of points with colors $c$ and $c'$. However, the existing upper bound and lower bound curves are not tight. Inspired by recent advances by Kopelowitz and Vassilevska-Williams [ICALP2020] regarding Set-disjointness data structures, we introduce new conditionally optimal algorithms for $(1+\varepsilon)$ approximation versions of the snippets problem and the CDO problem, by applying fast matrix multiplication. For example, for CDO on $n$ points in an array with preprocessing time $\tilde{O}(n^a)$ and query time $\tilde{O}(n^b)$, assuming that $\omega=2$ (where $\omega$ is the exponent of $n$ in the runtime of the fastest matrix multiplication algorithm on two squared matrices of size $n\times n$), we show that approximate CDO can be solved with the following tradeoff $$ a + 2b = 2 \text{ if } 0 \leq b \leq \frac1 3$$ $$ 2a + b = 3 \text{ if } \frac13\leq b \leq 1.$$ Moreover, we prove that for exact CDO on points in an array, the algorithm of Kopelowitz and Krauthgamer [CPM2016], is essentially optimal assuming that the strong APSP hypothesis holds for randomized algorithms. Thus, the exact version of CDO is strictly harder than the approximate version.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Noam Horowicz, Tsvi Kopelowitz. 2025-07-06. Color Distance Oracles and Snippets: Separation Between Exact and Approximate Solutions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04578

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS