Faster Estimation of the Average Degree of a Graph Using Random Edges and Structural Queries

Lorenzo Beretta; Deeparnab Chakrabarty; C. Seshadhri

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.06925

Faster Estimation of the Average Degree of a Graph Using Random Edges and Structural Queries

Lorenzo Beretta·Deeparnab Chakrabarty·C. Seshadhri

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We revisit the problem of designing sublinear algorithms for estimating the average degree of an $n$-vertex graph. The standard access model for graphs allows for the following queries: sampling a uniform random vertex, the degree of a vertex, sampling a uniform random neighbor of a vertex, and ``pair queries'' which determine if a pair of vertices form an edge. In this model, original results [Goldreich-Ron, RSA 2008; Eden-Ron-Seshadhri, SIDMA 2019] on this problem prove that the complexity of getting $(1+\varepsilon)$-multiplicative approximations to the average degree, ignoring $\varepsilon$-dependencies, is $\Theta(\sqrt{n})$. When random edges can be sampled, it is known that the average degree can estimated in $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/3})$ queries, even without pair queries [Motwani-Panigrahy-Xu, ICALP 2007; Beretta-Tetek, TALG 2024]. We give a nearly optimal algorithm in the standard access model with random edge samples. Our algorithm makes $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/4})$ queries exploiting the power of pair queries. We also analyze the ``full neighborhood access" model wherein the entire adjacency list of a vertex can be obtained with a single query; this model is relevant in many practical applications. In a weaker version of this model, we give an algorithm that makes $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/5})$ queries. Both these results underscore the power of {\em structural queries}, such as pair queries and full neighborhood access queries, for estimating the average degree. We give nearly matching lower bounds, ignoring $\varepsilon$-dependencies, for all our results. So far, almost all algorithms for estimating average degree assume that the number of vertices, $n$, is known. Inspired by [Beretta-Tetek, TALG 2024], we study this problem when $n$ is unknown and show that structural queries do not help in estimating average degree in this setting.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Lorenzo Beretta, Deeparnab Chakrabarty, C. Seshadhri. 2025-07-09. Faster Estimation of the Average Degree of a Graph Using Random Edges and Structural Queries. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06925

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗