A Randomized Rounding Approach for DAG Edge Deletion

Sina Kalantarzadeh; Nathan Klein; Victor Reis

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.07943

A Randomized Rounding Approach for DAG Edge Deletion

Sina Kalantarzadeh·Nathan Klein·Victor Reis

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the DAG Edge Deletion problem, we are given an edge-weighted directed acyclic graph and a parameter $k$, and the goal is to delete the minimum weight set of edges so that the resulting graph has no paths of length $k$. This problem, which has applications to scheduling, was introduced in 2015 by Kenkre, Pandit, Purohit, and Saket. They gave a $k$-approximation and showed that it is UGC-Hard to approximate better than $\lfloor 0.5k \rfloor$ for any constant $k \ge 4$ using a work of Svensson from 2012. The approximation ratio was improved to $\frac{2}{3}(k+1)$ by Klein and Wexler in 2016. In this work, we introduce a randomized rounding framework based on distributions over vertex labels in $[0,1]$. The most natural distribution is to sample labels independently from the uniform distribution over $[0,1]$. We show this leads to a $(2-\sqrt{2})(k+1) \approx 0.585(k+1)$-approximation. By using a modified (but still independent) label distribution, we obtain a $0.549(k+1)$-approximation for the problem, as well as show that no independent distribution over labels can improve our analysis to below $0.542(k+1)$. Finally, we show a $0.5(k+1)$-approximation for bipartite graphs and for instances with structured LP solutions. Whether this ratio can be obtained in general is open.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sina Kalantarzadeh, Nathan Klein, Victor Reis. 2025-07-10. A Randomized Rounding Approach for DAG Edge Deletion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07943

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗