SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.14621

Testing Clustered Equal Predictive Ability with Unknown Clusters

Abstract

We develop tests of clustered equal predictive ability (C-EPA) in panels where the clusters are unknown and estimated by the Panel Kmeans algorithm. To address the challenge of testing hypotheses that depend on data-driven clusters, we adopt a selective conditional inference framework. Specifically, we first derive a Wald-type test for pairwise equality and show that the limiting distribution of its square root conditional on the estimated clusters is that of a truncated $\chi$ variable. We characterize the associated truncation set by quadratic inequalities in the data space. Then, for the C-EPA hypothesis, we propose a $p$-value combination method by aggregating the evidence against the pairwise equality and overall EPA null hypotheses. The Monte Carlo results show accurate size control and good finite-sample power of the proposed tests. An empirical application to exchange-rate forecasting, using both traditional time-series models and machine-learning methods, illustrates the practical relevance of our procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Oguzhan Akgun, Alain Pirotte, Giovanni Urga, Zhenlin Yang. 2025-07-19. Testing Clustered Equal Predictive Ability with Unknown Clusters. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14621

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM