SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.15138

Adaptive Parameter Optimization in Gaussian Processes: A Comprehensive Study of Uncertainty Quantification and Dimensional Scaling

Abstract

Gaussian Process (GP) models have also become extremely useful for optimization under uncertainty algorithms, especially where the objective functions are costly to compute. Yet, the more classical methods usually adopt strategies that, in certain circumstances, might be effective but not flexible to be applied to a wide range of problem terrains. This study aims to adapt parameter optimization in GP models and especially how uncertainty quantification can assist in the learning process. We investigate the effect of adaptive kappa parameters that govern the exploration-exploitation trade-off and the interplay between dimensionality, penalty on uncertainty, and noise levels to influence optimization results. Uncertainty quantification is built directly into our comprehensive theoretical framework and gives us new algorithms to dynamically tune exploration-exploitation trade-offs according to the uncertainty trend observed in nature. We rigorously empirically test various strategies, parametrizing our tests by dimensionality, noise, penalty terms, and evaluate the performance of any given strategery in a wide variety of test settings, and show conclusively that adaptive strategies always outperform fixed ones, but in difficult settings, where the dimensions are large and the noise is severe, the advantage is enormous. We build theoretical assurances of convergence under different settings as well as furnish a sensible direction on the application of adaptive GP-based optimization even in very complicated conditions. The results of our work will help in the development of more efficient and robust methods of optimization of realistic problems in which there are only a few functions available for evaluation, and when quantifying the uncertainty, there is a need to know more about the uncertainty.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nishant Gadde. 2025-07-20. Adaptive Parameter Optimization in Gaussian Processes: A Comprehensive Study of Uncertainty Quantification and Dimensional Scaling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15138

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deterministic and Random Bipartite Matching on General Networks: Convex Flow Reformulation, Asymptotic Properties, and Fast Algorithms

Minimum-distance bipartite matching on general networks has numerous applications various fields. This paper first focuses on deterministic problems and presents an exact edgewise-separable convex-flow reformulation. By introducing a smooth monotone rearrangement approximation of the edge-wise imbalance profiles, the convex-flow reformulation's can be solved efficiently. If we further conduct a first-order resistance-based approximation of the convex program, a one-step Laplacian-based estimator can be analytically derived in closed forms. The paper also studies random problems where supply and demand points are randomly distributed. We show that the expected optimal matching distance scales with the square root of the number of points if the supply/demand point distributions are identical, or linearly otherwise. In the former case, the optimal flow is proven to be centered, symmetric, and sub-Gaussian. In the latter case, the limiting resistance network characterizes how supply-demand imbalance is redistributed and motivates a fast algorithm that approximate the optimal flow based on the limiting resistance. Numerical experiments show that the proposed estimators closely approximate the exact matching cost while substantially reducing computation time. The proven theoretical properties of the random matching solution are numerically verified by large-scale Monte Carlo simulations.

math.OC

Conformal-DRO: Distributionally Robust Optimization with Conformalized Ambiguity Set

Data-driven distributionally robust optimization (DRO) typically treats the conditional outcome law as fixed and uses ambiguity sets to capture estimation error. This paper studies latent distributional heterogeneity, where each instance has an unobserved law but contributes only one observation, so uncertainty persists even if the mixture law is known. We propose Conformal-DRO, which uses nested conformal regions to construct an ambiguity set for the future latent law. Under exchangeability, the set covers this law with probability at least $1-\alpha$ in finite samples, without estimating underlying latent laws or their mixing mechanism. The conformal path induces a data-driven transport geometry, while $\alpha$ determines the radius. The worst-case problem reduces to a finite linear program over conformal shells and admits sparse adversarial solutions. The resulting robust value provides a finite-sample certificate for the selected decision's expected cost.

math.OC

The best approximation tuple: an extension of the Cheney-Goldstein algorithm and results to the multiple sets case

In this paper we extend the algorithm and several results published in the celebrated 1959 paper of Cheney and Goldstein about the best approximation pair (BAP) problem in two separate directions. One is the consideration of more than two sets. The other is the ability to handle each set as an intersections of a finite family of sets. We call the resulting problem the "Best Approximation Tuple (BAT) problem". The fundamental observation that leads to this generalizations is to recognize and handle one set (the "pivot set") as different from the remaining sets (the "satellite sets") instead of seeking cycles as the minimizers of a target functional. This enable us to overcome a certain theoretical obstacle related to cycles and minimizers of general functionals. We prove the convergence of the algorithm to the unique solution of the problem in the Euclidean case with strictly convex and compact satellite sets. Because of the lack of Fej\'er monotonicity, our convergence analysis is not standard, and is based on almost unknown properties of orthogonal projections regarding equality and inequality in the definition of nonexpansiveness.

math.OC