Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.15598

Fast Algorithms for Graph Arboricity and Related Problems

Ruoxu Cen·Henry Fleischmann·George Z. Li·Jason Li·Debmalya Panigrahi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We give an algorithm for finding the arboricity of a weighted, undirected graph, defined as the minimum number of spanning forests that cover all edges of the graph, in $\sqrt{n} m^{1+o(1)}$ time. This improves on the previous best bound of $\tilde{O}(nm)$ for weighted graphs and $\tilde{O}(m^{3/2}) $ for unweighted graphs (Gabow 1995) for this problem. The running time of our algorithm is dominated by a logarithmic number of calls to a directed global minimum cut subroutine -- if the running time of the latter problem improves to $m^{1+o(1)}$ (thereby matching the running time of maximum flow), the running time of our arboricity algorithm would improve further to $m^{1+o(1)}$. We also give a new algorithm for computing the entire cut hierarchy -- laminar multiway cuts with minimum cut ratio in recursively defined induced subgraphs -- in $m n^{1+o(1)}$ time. The cut hierarchy yields the ideal edge loads (Thorup 2001) in a fractional spanning tree packing of the graph which, we show, also corresponds to a max-entropy solution in the spanning tree polytope. For the cut hierarchy problem, the previous best bound was $\tilde{O}(n^2 m)$ for weighted graphs and $\tilde{O}(n m^{3/2})$ for unweighted graphs.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ruoxu Cen, Henry Fleischmann, George Z. Li, Jason Li, Debmalya Panigrahi. 2025-07-21. Fast Algorithms for Graph Arboricity and Related Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15598

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗