SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.20804

MMGraphRAG: Bridging Vision and Language with Interpretable Multimodal Knowledge Graphs

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from hallucinations due to their static parametric knowledge. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and GraphRAG mitigate this issue by incorporating external knowledge and structured reasoning over knowledge graphs (KGs). However, existing approaches remain largely text-centric, as constructing fine-grained multimodal knowledge graphs (MMKGs) with explicit cross-modal semantics remains challenging. In this paper, we propose MMGraphRAG, a framework for building interpretable MMKGs that unify textual and visual knowledge. Our approach represents visual content as structured scene graphs and integrates them with textual KGs through a novel cross-modal entity linking method, SpecLink, which leverages spectral clustering to jointly model semantic similarity and graph structure. This design preserves explicit entities, relations, and reasoning paths across modalities, enabling structure-aware retrieval and generation. To support evaluation, we introduce the CMEL dataset, a benchmark for fine-grained cross-modal entity alignment. Experimental results on CMEL demonstrate improved entity linking accuracy, while evaluations on DocBench and MMLongBench show that MMGraphRAG achieves superior performance and stronger robustness, particularly in complex multimodal reasoning scenarios.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xueyao Wan, Hang Yu. 2025-07-28. MMGraphRAG: Bridging Vision and Language with Interpretable Multimodal Knowledge Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20804

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI