In-Situ Soil-Property Estimation and Bayesian Mapping with a Simulated Compact Track Loader

W. Jacob Wagner; Ahmet Soylemezoglu; Katherine Driggs-Campbell

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.22356

In-Situ Soil-Property Estimation and Bayesian Mapping with a Simulated Compact Track Loader

W. Jacob Wagner·Ahmet Soylemezoglu·Katherine Driggs-Campbell

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Existing earthmoving autonomy is largely confined to highly controlled and well-characterized environments due to the complexity of vehicle-terrain interaction dynamics and the partial observability of the terrain resulting from unknown and spatially varying soil conditions. In this chapter, a a soil-property mapping system is proposed to extend the environmental state, in order to overcome these restrictions and facilitate development of more robust autonomous earthmoving. A GPU accelerated elevation mapping system is extended to incorporate a blind mapping component which traces the movement of the blade through the terrain to displace and erode intersected soil, enabling separately tracking undisturbed and disturbed soil. Each interaction is approximated as a flat blade moving through a locally homogeneous soil, enabling modeling of cutting forces using the fundamental equation of earthmoving (FEE). Building upon our prior work on in situ soil-property estimation, a method is devised to extract approximate geometric parameters of the model given the uneven terrain, and an improved physics infused neural network (PINN) model is developed to predict soil properties and uncertainties of these estimates. A simulation of a compact track loader (CTL) with a blade attachment is used to collect data to train the PINN model. Post-training, the model is leveraged online by the mapping system to track soil property estimates spatially as separate layers in the map, with updates being performed in a Bayesian manner. Initial experiments show that the system accurately highlights regions requiring higher relative interaction forces, indicating the promise of this approach in enabling soil-aware planning for autonomous terrain shaping.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

W. Jacob Wagner, Ahmet Soylemezoglu, Katherine Driggs-Campbell. 2025-07-30. In-Situ Soil-Property Estimation and Bayesian Mapping with a Simulated Compact Track Loader. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗