arXiv · 2508.01535
Relative Completeness of Incorrectness Separation Logic
Abstract
Incorrectness Separation Logic (ISL) is a proof system that is tailored specifically to resolve problems of under-approximation in programs that manipulate heaps, and it primarily focuses on bug detection. This approach is different from the over-approximation methods that are used in traditional logics such as Hoare Logic or Separation Logic. Although the soundness of ISL has been established, its completeness remains unproven. In this study, we establish relative completeness by leveraging the expressiveness of the weakest postconditions; expressiveness is a factor that is critical to demonstrating relative completeness in Reverse Hoare Logic. In our ISL framework, we allow for infinite disjunctions in disjunctive normal forms, where each clause comprises finite symbolic heaps with existential quantifiers. To compute the weakest postconditions in ISL, we introduce a canonicalization that includes variable aliasing.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Yeonseok Lee, Koji Nakazawa. 2025-08-03. Relative Completeness of Incorrectness Separation Logic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01535
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.