arXiv · 2508.01921
InspectVLM: Unified in Theory, Unreliable in Practice
Abstract
Unified vision-language models (VLMs) promise to streamline computer vision pipelines by reframing multiple visual tasks such as classification, detection, and keypoint localization within a single language-driven interface. This architecture is particularly appealing in industrial inspection, where managing disjoint task-specific models introduces complexity, inefficiency, and maintenance overhead. In this paper, we critically evaluate the viability of this unified paradigm using InspectVLM, a Florence-2-based VLM trained on InspectMM, our new large-scale multimodal, multitask inspection dataset. While InspectVLM performs competitively on image-level classification and structured keypoint tasks, we find that it fails to match traditional ResNet-based models in core inspection metrics. Notably, the model exhibits brittle behavior under low prompt variability, produces degenerate outputs for fine-grained object detection, and frequently defaults to memorized language responses regardless of visual input. Our findings suggest that while language-driven unification offers conceptual elegance, current VLMs lack the visual grounding and robustness necessary for deployment in precision critical industrial inspections.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Conor Wallace, Isaac Corley, Jonathan Lwowski. 2025-08-03. InspectVLM: Unified in Theory, Unreliable in Practice. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01921
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.