SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2508.05124

Text Indexing and Pattern Matching with Ephemeral Edits

Abstract

A sequence $e_0,e_1,\ldots$ of edit operations in a string $T$ is called ephemeral if operation $e_i$ constructing string $T^i$, for all $i=2k$ with $k\in\mathbb{N}$, is reverted by operation $e_{i+1}$ that reconstructs $T$. Such a sequence arises when processing a stream of independent edits or testing hypothetical edits. We introduce text indexing with ephemeral substring edits, a new version of text indexing. Our goal is to design a data structure over a given text that supports subsequent pattern matching queries with ephemeral substring insertions, deletions, or substitutions in the text; we require insertions and substitutions to be of constant length. In particular, we preprocess a text $T=T[0\mathinner{.\,.} n)$ over an integer alphabet $\Sigma=[0,\sigma)$ with $\sigma=n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ in $\mathcal{O}(n)$ time. Then, we can preprocess any arbitrary pattern $P=P[0\mathinner{.\,.} m)$ given online in $\mathcal{O}(m\log\log m)$ time and $\mathcal{O}(m)$ space and allow any ephemeral sequence of edit operations in $T$. Before reverting the $i$th operation, we report all Occ occurrences of $P$ in $T^i$ in $\mathcal{O}(\log\log n + \text{Occ})$ time. We also introduce pattern matching with ephemeral edits. In particular, we preprocess two strings $T$ and $P$, each of length at most $n$, over an integer alphabet $\Sigma=[0,\sigma)$ with $\sigma=n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ in $\mathcal{O}(n)$ time. Then, we allow any ephemeral sequence of edit operations in $T$. Before reverting the $i$th operation, we report all Occ occurrences of $P$ in $T^i$ in the optimal $\mathcal{O}(\text{Occ})$ time. Along our way to this result, we also give an optimal solution for pattern matching with ephemeral block deletions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Solon P. Pissis. 2025-08-07. Text Indexing and Pattern Matching with Ephemeral Edits. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05124

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS