Rethinking the Sioux Falls Network: Insights from Path-Driven Higher-Order Network Analysis

Abstract

Benchmark scenarios are widely used in transportation research to evaluate routing algorithms, simulate infrastructure interventions, and test new technologies under controlled conditions. However, the structural and behavioral fidelity of these benchmarks remains largely unquantified, raising concerns about the external validity of simulation results. In this study, we introduce a mathematical framework based on higher-order network models to evaluate the representativeness of benchmark networks, focusing on the widely used Sioux Falls scenario. Higher-order network models encode empirical and simulated trajectory data into memory-aware network representations, which we use to quantify sequential dependencies in mobility behavior and assess how well benchmark networks capture real-world structural and functional patterns. Applying this framework to the Sioux Falls network, as well as real-world trajectory data, we quantify structural complexity, optimal memory length, link prediction accuracy, and centrality alignment. Our results show and statistically quantify that the classical Sioux Falls network exhibits limited path diversity, rapid structural fragmentation at higher orders, and weak alignment with empirical routing behavior. These results illustrate the potential of higher-order network models to bridge the gap between simulation-based and real-world mobility analysis, providing a robust foundation for more accurate and generalizable insights in transportation research.