SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2508.06925

Comparing Notions of Dense Computability on $\omega^\omega$ and $2^\omega$

Abstract

A relatively new topic in computability theory is the study of notions of computation that are robust against mistakes on some kind of small set. However, despite the recent popularity of this topic relatively foundational questions about the notions of reducibility involved still persist. In this paper, we examine two notions of robust information coding, effective dense reducibility and coarse reducibility and answer the question posed in [1]: whether the degrees of functions under these reductions are the same as the degrees of sets. Despite the surface similarity of these two reducibilities we show that every uniform coarse degree contains a set but that this fails even for the non-uniform effective dense degrees. We then further distinguish these two notions by showing that whether g is coarsely reducible to f is an arithmetic property of f and g while for non-uniform effective dense reducibility it is a $\Pi^1_1$ complete property. To prove these results we introduce notions of forcing that allow us to build generic effective dense and coarse descriptions which may be of use in further exploration of these topics - including the open questions we pose in the final section.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter M. Gerdes. 2025-08-09. Comparing Notions of Dense Computability on $\omega^\omega$ and $2^\omega$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06925

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO