SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2508.08169

Sparsifying Sums of Positive Semidefinite Matrices

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit spectral sparsification for sums of arbitrary positive semidefinite (PSD) matrices. Concretely, for any collection of PSD matrices $\mathcal{A} = \{A_1, A_2, \ldots, A_r\} \subset \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$, given any subset $T \subseteq [r]$, our goal is to find sparse weights $\mu \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^r$ such that $(1 - \epsilon) \sum_{i \in T} A_i \preceq \sum_{i \in T} \mu_i A_i \preceq (1 + \epsilon) \sum_{i \in T} A_i.$ This generalizes spectral sparsification of graphs which corresponds to $\mathcal{A}$ being the set of Laplacians of edges. It also captures sparsifying Cayley graphs by choosing a subset of generators. The former has been extensively studied with optimal sparsifiers known. The latter has received attention recently and was solved for a few special groups (e.g., $\mathbb{F}_2^n$). Prior work shows any sum of PSD matrices can be sparsified down to $O(n)$ elements. This bound however turns out to be too coarse and in particular yields no non-trivial bound for building Cayley sparsifiers for Cayley graphs. In this work, we develop a new, instance-specific (i.e., specific to a given collection $\mathcal{A}$) theory of PSD matrix sparsification based on a new parameter $N^*(\mathcal{A})$ which we call connectivity threshold that generalizes the threshold of the number of edges required to make a graph connected. Our main result gives a sparsifier that uses at most $O(\epsilon^{-2}N^*(\mathcal{A}) (\log n)(\log r))$ matrices and is constructible in randomized polynomial time. We also show that we need $N^*(\mathcal{A})$ elements to sparsify for any $\epsilon < 0.99$. As the main application of our framework, we prove that any Cayley graph can be sparsified to $O(\epsilon^{-2}\log^4 N)$ generators. Previously, a non-trivial bound on Cayley sparsifiers was known only in the case when the group is $\mathbb{F}_2^n$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arpon Basu, Pravesh K. Kothari, Yang P. Liu, Raghu Meka. 2025-08-11. Sparsifying Sums of Positive Semidefinite Matrices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08169

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS