Mathematical Validation of a Cancer Model

Marcela V. Reale; Gustavo Paccosi; David H. Margarit; Lilia Romanelli

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2508.10910

Mathematical Validation of a Cancer Model

Marcela V. Reale·Gustavo Paccosi·David H. Margarit·Lilia Romanelli

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Understanding cancer cell differentiation is essential for advancing its detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Mathematical models significantly contribute to this by providing a theoretical framework to understand the complex interactions between cancer stem cells, differentiated cancer cells, and immune system components. Such models depend on experimental data and computational simulations to predict tumor dynamics, offering insights into how different cell populations evolve over time. However, to ensure their realistic and consistent outcomes, rigorous mathematical analysis is required, including verification of solution uniqueness, stability, viability, positivity, and boundedness. Such validation guarantees that model's results can be used in both oncological research and clinical applications. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of an integrative mathematical model of cancer cell differentiation, with a particular focus on its interactions with immune cells. The model captures the dynamic balance between cancer stem cell self-renewal, differentiation into mature tumor cells, and immune-mediated elimination. By employing analytical and numerical techniques, we assess the model's feasibility, stability, and long-term behavior under various biological conditions. Our findings demonstrate that immune system engagement can significantly influence tumor composition and growth, highlighting potential therapeutic targets. This work not only advances theoretical cancer modeling but also provides a foundation for future experimental validation and the development of combined differentiation-immunotherapy approaches. The results underscore the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in the fight against cancer.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.TO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Marcela V. Reale, Gustavo Paccosi, David H. Margarit, Lilia Romanelli. 2025-07-31. Mathematical Validation of a Cancer Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10910

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adaptive therapy under parametric, structural, and measurement uncertainty

Adaptive therapy has emerged as a promising treatment strategy that exploits within-tumour competition to delay disease progression. Implementation, however, typically relies on indirect measurements of tumour burden and must account for potentially substantial patient heterogeneity. In this work, we capture patient-to-patient variability, parameter uncertainty, and imperfect biomarker measurements with a mathematical and statistical model that we calibrate to clinical prostate cancer data using a Bayesian inference framework. We use the resulting virtual cohort to demonstrate that, within the simple but now well-established Lotka-Volterra-based model, adaptive therapy robustly improves time-to-progression for the subset of patients that are predicted to eventually progress by the model. To account for other risk factors associated with larger tumour volumes, we introduce a new metric based on the risk of metastasis that demonstrates how adaptive therapy may be disadvantageous when sustained tumour burden is also considered. Given the ubiquity of uncertainty in oncology, we then describe several future modelling directions that also capture uncertainty in the temporal evolution of the underlying tumour or biomarker dynamics. Finally, we demonstrate how model misspecification and non-identifiability can lead to unreliable predictions, especially if uncertainty is inadequately captured.

q-bio.TO↗

arXiv2026

Head Impact Characterization and Cellular Response of a Live-neuron cell-integrated Biomechanical Full-body Surrogate Model

In this study, we develop a novel integrated framework that links the impact response with cellular dynamics using a live-neuron cell-integrated biomechanical full-body surrogate model. The impact event is simulated by allowing the surrogate model to fall from controlled seated release angles of 30-degree, 60-degree, and 90-degree. Three vertically stacked cell-culture Petri dishes, each containing live SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, were placed inside the head of a commercially available surrogate model. The dynamic response of the impact event was evaluated using acceleration measurements from six accelerometers, comprising three sensors mounted on the head surface and three embedded in series with the cell stacks, along with kinematic measurements of the fall and deformation of the head model. In parallel, an OpenSim-based modified musculoskeletal model was used to simulate the fall experiment. We found that variation in contact stiffness produced the largest change in the predicted head acceleration in the simulation. When the cellular response and the measured accelerations are compared, oxidative stress and cell viability showed trends consistent with the regional acceleration and angle of fall. At the 90-degree fall, where median peak linear accelerations ranged from 170-258g, and the maximum headform deformation was approximately 9.4 mm, oxidative stress increased to approximately twice that of the control sample. We also quantified the cellular drift of SH-SY5Y cells, which is focal in nature for the 90-degree impact condition. The corresponding fall scenarios were also simulated in OpenSim and a preliminary calibration relationship was developed to compare the kinematic responses of the physical surrogate and musculoskeletal model. Finally, the framework provides a basis for relating experimental surrogate measurements to human head-neck response during impact.

q-bio.TO↗

arXiv2026

History Matters: Damage-Mediated Amplification of Brain Deformation and Injury Risk under Repeated Head Impacts

Computational head models are typically applied to isolated impacts, leaving repeated head loading largely unexplored. An Ogden-Roxburgh Mullins damage formulation was implemented in a high-fidelity finite element head model to represent loading-history-dependent softening during cyclic brain-tissue deformation. Repeated-loading histories derived from mixed martial arts head-impact data were applied and compared with damage-free hyperelastic (HE) and linear visco-hyperelastic (LVHE) model variants. Under five identical single-axis cycles, Mullins-type softening progressively increased strain and strain rate metrics relative to the HE model. Mullins-based injury probabilities progressively exceeded strain-based HE predictions and diverged from unchanged kinematics-based predictions, indicating that neglecting prior softening may underestimate injury risk. In a randomized twenty-cycle multiaxial sequence, cycles of similar kinematic intensity produced different deformation and injury-risk estimates depending on prior softening. HE and LVHE models predicted higher injury probabilities initially, whereas the Mullins-based model produced the largest later-cycle estimates and highest probability of at least one injury over the sequence. Regional amplification depended on loading direction and prior softening, with no direction-independent trend among brain substructures. Gyral elements exhibited higher cumulative maximum principal strain than sulcal elements, which showed greater amplification relative to initial responses. These findings demonstrate that short-term damage-mediated softening can substantially amplify tissue deformation and injury-risk estimates beyond damage-free head models under the same loading histories. Further experimental characterization of cyclic brain-tissue softening is needed to improve models of repeated head loading and traumatic brain injury.

q-bio.TO↗